Pakistani Militants Torch 160 U.S. and NATO Vehicles

by: Brandon Friedman

Mon Dec 08, 2008 at 04:13:45 AM EST


La, la, la. . .(eyes closed, fingers in ears). . .I can't hear you:

PESHAWAR, Pakistan - Militants torched 160 vehicles, including dozens of Humvees destined for U.S. and allied forces fighting in Afghanistan, in the boldest attack so far on the critical military supply line through Pakistan.

The American military said Sunday's raid on two transport terminals near the beleaguered Pakistani city of Peshawar would have "minimal" impact on anti-Taliban operations set to expand with the arrival of thousands more troops next year.

(Reuters photo)

At some point this becomes a problem.  I know that a major military incursion into Pakistan is the Idea Which Cannot Be Spoken, but many of the burned out vehicles in the photos were up-armored humvees.  And the loss of those vehicles directly endangers the lives of American soldiers serving in Afghanistan.  Consequently, we shouldn't be asking men and women to risk their lives in Afghanistan if we're only going to let Pakistani militants to dictate what equipment our troops get to use.

As this is at least the second time something like this has happened in less than a month, I would think that the U.S. military might want to start thinking about alternative supply routes--that is, unless America wants to invade western Pakistan in an effort to seize and hold routes and supply points the Pakistani military is unwilling or incapable of protecting.

And I'll tell you, when I saw the burned out vehicles in the Peshawar photos yesterday, the first thing I thought of was the Highway of Death leading out of Kuwait in 1991.  Remember all those burned out, destroyed Iraqi vehicles we blew up?  You know what that was for us?  A big, giant middle finger directed toward all those who would oppose us.  It was a big dance in the end zone.  

And it's the same thing for these guys in Pakistan.  This is a huge confidence builder for the Taliban, and the next attack will be even more catastrophic.  You can bank on it.  

These people who don't want us there are very serious about their business.  They don't want us there and they clearly have the will to win.  They've demonstrated it on both sides of the Durand Line for decades.  If we don't match that tenacity soon--or get out completely--then we're fucked.  Because this game of perpetual denial about how bad the situation is in Pakistan just won't cut it.

Brandon Friedman :: Pakistani Militants Torch 160 U.S. and NATO Vehicles
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Well (4.00 / 1)
we are going to have to do something about both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia pretty damn soon, if we really want to win. If we aren't going to do something about both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia soon, I don't really think we should be asking our men and women to be risking their lives in either Afghanistan or Iraq.

I vote BUNS OUT... (0.00 / 0)
Winning at best is controlling the major cities. At the least is having a few air bases and a port that are 'safe'.

Curious about the Humvees. Are these MADE IN  Pakistan? We gave them the Tech and contract to build them?  Gotta think that they are built in Pak or they would have come in through Karachi.

O/T: Condi is yapping about  Pak-India 'stuff' a week after she proclaimed how much the Shrubbers have done for the ME and dissing Rummy. Talk about "NO creds Condi" and her mushroom shaped clouds.



SoS Rice will do herself a great favor... (4.00 / 1)
and do wonders for her President hero's precious legacy if she would just stop talking...publically and privately and go quitely into the night, sooner rather than later.

It seems that the transition itself may be triggering some of what is happening here and God knows how much worse it will get if we don't get a vitual changing of the guard NOW...in some shape or form because I don't think we can wait until late January.


[ Parent ]
My First Thought (0.00 / 0)
Was the same, and you have the pic above that I first saw.

The 'Highway of Death' was the first time I could remember Ever seeing our Military Totally Destroy a Retreating Military Force not setup to Fight Back!!

It not only was as you put it, the showing of what we would do in the future, the endzone dance of Superiority, It Was The Most Tragic Example Of Arrogance that Inflamed the Already Known Hatreds for our past policies in that region, Especially For Those Who Couldn't Stand Saddam even, It was the Example of what they had already been saying about us and all the proof needed to back up their rhetoric!!

You guys and gals have been fighting the kids, relatives, friends and strangers of those ripped apart in that sorry military example of strength, a Desert Shooting Gallery!!!!    

'Hearts and Minds, "The ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of the people who actually live there." -- President Lyndon Johnson


2nd Peshawar attack... (4.00 / 1)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sou...

Some other stuff up at
http://www.atimes.com

1. NATO backing away from US "Pax Americana" plan not wanting to get into another struggle with Russia.

2. The effect of putting pressure on LeT [both military and humanitarian side], AQ in India and the reploying of troops to the Kashmir region.

Interestingly, The News the major English language news source from Pakistan is not covering this story.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/  


The Pakistani military is showing here its inability, or just plain lack of desire (4.00 / 1)
to protect our supply routes.  Personally, I believe that a full withdrawal from Afghanistan would endanger American lives in the long run.  That being said we need to do two things.  One, select new supply routes.  Two, use our own military to hold them - regardless of where they are, and with force where necessary.

"No U.S. soldier ever dies in vain because they're carrying out the missions of their commander in chief. And we honor all the service that they've provided." - Barack Obama

I can understand why the military is playing this down (0.00 / 0)
However, one can not escape the fact that a sustained military presence can not last very long without stable supply lines to support it.  If new ground supply lines can not be found to offset these losses then I suspect the military will move to the air.  Finding new ground supply lines may become more troublesome as well especially if the finding from a French think tank prove accurate:

Taliban Expanding Foothold in Afghanistan, Report Finds

WASHINGTON -- The Taliban have expanded their footprint in Afghanistan and now have a permanent presence in nearly three-quarters of the country, according to a new report.

The Paris-based International Council on Security and Development, a think tank that maintains full-time offices in Afghanistan, said the Taliban have spread across much of the country and are beginning to encircle the capital, Kabul.

The group said Taliban fighters have advanced out of southern Afghanistan, a region where they often hold de facto governing power, and carry out regular attacks in western and northwestern Afghanistan as well as in and around Kabul. Taliban forces can be found in 72% of Afghanistan, up from 54% a year earlier.

"While the international community's prospects in Afghanistan have never been bleaker, the Taliban has been experiencing a renaissance that has gained momentum since 2005," the report said. "The West is in genuine danger of losing Afghanistan."

http://online.wsj.com/article/...

"Armed forces abroad are of little value unless there is prudent counsel at home."

Marcus Tullius Cicero 106 BC-43 BC


VetVoice on Facebook
VetVoice Recommends

"The War I Always Wanted,"
By Brandon Friedman

"The welcome mat for memoirs by veterans of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom might never wear out so long as they write with the savvy of Brandon Friedman . . . Friedman's take is vivid, frank, precise and dramatic." --Military Times

"Add Brandon Friedman's The War I Always Wanted to the ranks of outstanding non-fiction produced by officers from elite combat units in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Always truthful, often excruciatingly so, The War I Always Wanted rises at numerous points to the level of literature." --Steven Pressfield, author of Gates of Fire

Buy The War I Always Wanted here.

"A Time To Lead,"
By General (Ret.) Wesley K. Clark

"A Time To Lead confirms the rewarding benefits of military service at a time when such service is experiencing considerable strain. It also includes a comprehensive description of America's current national imperatives, which deserve serious consideration." --General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., former Secretary of State

"This is a primer on leadership forged in battle and by decades of experience. . .This isn't just a book; it's a manual for leading people and living a good life." --Barry McCaffrey, General, USA (ret.)

Buy A Time to Lead here.

"Love My Rifle More Than You,"
By Kayla Williams

"Whip smart, sassy, with a mouth as foul as a sailor's, 28-year-old Sergeant Kayla Williams. . .tells what it's like to be a female soldier in Iraq." --Booklist

". . .echoes military memoirists from Julius Caesar to Ernie Pyle." --Publishers Weekly

". . .a shocking, on-the-ground view of one military woman's experience in Iraq." --Bookmarks Magazine

Buy Love My Rifle More Than You here.

"How to Break a Terrorist,"
By Matthew Alexander

"...a riveting, fast-paced account that reads like a first-rate thriller." --Publisher's Weekly

" ...an absorbing behind-the-scenes look at the secret intelligence war within a war." --Military.com

Buy How to Break a Terrorist here.

RSS Feed Links

Subscribe to VetVoice in a feed reader!

Subscribe to VetVoice by Email!

Diaries and comments at VetVoice do not necessarily represent the views of VoteVets.org. VetVoice will strive to remove any illegal material as soon as it is flagged. Similarly, VetVoice will use its discretion in determining whether to remove exceedingly offensive material. However, between posting and removal, any offensive or illegal material does not reflect the condoning or endorsing of said material by VoteVets.org or VetVoice.
Similarly, the views expressed on this website are those of the authors alone. Opinions on this website do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.
Menu

Front Page Writers
PTSD Resources
TBI Resources
IRR Information
Casualty Reports
VA Information
Support the Troops
Veteran Candidates We Support
Congressional Committees
Contact Your Elected Leaders
Sites We Like
Search

Advanced Search

Paid for VoteVets Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. VoteVets Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization which primarily focuses on nonpartisan education and advocacy on behalf veterans and their families. VoteVets Political Action Committee is a federal political committee which primarily helps elect Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran candidates and educates about veterans and military issues aimed at influencing the outcome of the next election.

Site Design: Articulated Man

VoteVets Political Action and Vote Vets Action Fund are separate organizations.

Powered by: SoapBlox